<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: VI Use Of Rum Cover Over Permitted By Current Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cruciansinfocus.com/2010/02/08/report-vi-use-of-rum-cover-over-permitted-by-current-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cruciansinfocus.com/2010/02/08/report-vi-use-of-rum-cover-over-permitted-by-current-law/</link>
	<description>&#34;We knew the job was dangerous when we took it.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://cruciansinfocus.com/2010/02/08/report-vi-use-of-rum-cover-over-permitted-by-current-law/comment-page-3/#comment-19964</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cruciansinfocus.com/?p=3891#comment-19964</guid>
		<description>I just watched News Channel 8, and a man who used to work at buildiing the Diageo plant told the reporter that there are safety issues at the site.  When he voiced his concerns to his supervisors, his time was gradually reduced until he was out of the job.  you can catch that story at 11:00.

CIF, maybe you can look into the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just watched News Channel 8, and a man who used to work at buildiing the Diageo plant told the reporter that there are safety issues at the site.  When he voiced his concerns to his supervisors, his time was gradually reduced until he was out of the job.  you can catch that story at 11:00.</p>
<p>CIF, maybe you can look into the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wake Up</title>
		<link>http://cruciansinfocus.com/2010/02/08/report-vi-use-of-rum-cover-over-permitted-by-current-law/comment-page-2/#comment-13991</link>
		<dc:creator>Wake Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cruciansinfocus.com/?p=3891#comment-13991</guid>
		<description>The costs are rising and the division is growing: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/86823.html

I wonder what Barbara Petersen, Jean Greaux and Governor deJongh have to say about divisiveness? They were pretty busy during the 2006 campaign throwing around that word. Now their Administration will be labeled divisive and incompetent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The costs are rising and the division is growing: <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/86823.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/86823.html</a></p>
<p>I wonder what Barbara Petersen, Jean Greaux and Governor deJongh have to say about divisiveness? They were pretty busy during the 2006 campaign throwing around that word. Now their Administration will be labeled divisive and incompetent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Point of View</title>
		<link>http://cruciansinfocus.com/2010/02/08/report-vi-use-of-rum-cover-over-permitted-by-current-law/comment-page-2/#comment-13213</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Point of View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cruciansinfocus.com/?p=3891#comment-13213</guid>
		<description>by the way, reading is apparently not your problem....it&#039;s comprehension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by the way, reading is apparently not your problem&#8230;.it&#8217;s comprehension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Point of View</title>
		<link>http://cruciansinfocus.com/2010/02/08/report-vi-use-of-rum-cover-over-permitted-by-current-law/comment-page-2/#comment-13212</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Point of View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cruciansinfocus.com/?p=3891#comment-13212</guid>
		<description>As I began my conversation, Time will tell...let&#039;s hope that we all can admit wrong when the time comes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I began my conversation, Time will tell&#8230;let&#8217;s hope that we all can admit wrong when the time comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cruciansinfocus.com/2010/02/08/report-vi-use-of-rum-cover-over-permitted-by-current-law/comment-page-2/#comment-13151</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cruciansinfocus.com/?p=3891#comment-13151</guid>
		<description>Clock,

It is apparent she can&#039;t read.  She listens well and then repeats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clock,</p>
<p>It is apparent she can&#8217;t read.  She listens well and then repeats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Clock Is Ticking</title>
		<link>http://cruciansinfocus.com/2010/02/08/report-vi-use-of-rum-cover-over-permitted-by-current-law/comment-page-2/#comment-13147</link>
		<dc:creator>The Clock Is Ticking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cruciansinfocus.com/?p=3891#comment-13147</guid>
		<description>@ APV
Ok. Once more then I am done with you.

There is no restriction on where Diageo can sell its liquor as long as they produce 1.5 million to meet their contractural obligation to the Virgin islands.

My facts are straight. Can you read?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ APV<br />
Ok. Once more then I am done with you.</p>
<p>There is no restriction on where Diageo can sell its liquor as long as they produce 1.5 million to meet their contractural obligation to the Virgin islands.</p>
<p>My facts are straight. Can you read?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Point of View</title>
		<link>http://cruciansinfocus.com/2010/02/08/report-vi-use-of-rum-cover-over-permitted-by-current-law/comment-page-2/#comment-13145</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Point of View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cruciansinfocus.com/?p=3891#comment-13145</guid>
		<description>I am addressing where the Rum from Diageo produced in the Territory can be sold. It doesn&#039;t make a difference if it is 1.5 million or more...not sure what you are talking about. Get your facts straight</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am addressing where the Rum from Diageo produced in the Territory can be sold. It doesn&#8217;t make a difference if it is 1.5 million or more&#8230;not sure what you are talking about. Get your facts straight</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Clock Is Ticking</title>
		<link>http://cruciansinfocus.com/2010/02/08/report-vi-use-of-rum-cover-over-permitted-by-current-law/comment-page-2/#comment-13141</link>
		<dc:creator>The Clock Is Ticking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cruciansinfocus.com/?p=3891#comment-13141</guid>
		<description>@ Another Point of View

What document did you read? Look at Exhibit D in the agreement posted in the Document Library (Diageo Agreement, Part 2) on this site. It clearly shows the minimum requirement for production per this agreement is 1.5 million gallons and elsewhere in the document it states how much beyond that amount Diageo would have the capacity to produce in later phases of the project.

If you&#039;re going to post, at least know what you&#039;re talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Another Point of View</p>
<p>What document did you read? Look at Exhibit D in the agreement posted in the Document Library (Diageo Agreement, Part 2) on this site. It clearly shows the minimum requirement for production per this agreement is 1.5 million gallons and elsewhere in the document it states how much beyond that amount Diageo would have the capacity to produce in later phases of the project.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to post, at least know what you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Point of View</title>
		<link>http://cruciansinfocus.com/2010/02/08/report-vi-use-of-rum-cover-over-permitted-by-current-law/comment-page-2/#comment-13138</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Point of View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cruciansinfocus.com/?p=3891#comment-13138</guid>
		<description>In the Diageo agreement, it states that rum produced in the Territory can only be sold in the U.S. Don&#039;t rely on misinformation. It&#039;s in black and white in the document.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Diageo agreement, it states that rum produced in the Territory can only be sold in the U.S. Don&#8217;t rely on misinformation. It&#8217;s in black and white in the document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EyesWideOpen2010!</title>
		<link>http://cruciansinfocus.com/2010/02/08/report-vi-use-of-rum-cover-over-permitted-by-current-law/comment-page-2/#comment-13135</link>
		<dc:creator>EyesWideOpen2010!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cruciansinfocus.com/?p=3891#comment-13135</guid>
		<description>@ We need a Mapp on February 9, 2010 at 9:46 pm,

If what you say is so, that&#039;s GREAT!

In the end, on that final day, in the voting booth, on November 2010, I will emphatically vote for who is LEFT STANDING: Mapp or Donastrog OVER de Jongh. 

Governor Mapp or Governor Donastorg January 2011!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ We need a Mapp on February 9, 2010 at 9:46 pm,</p>
<p>If what you say is so, that&#8217;s GREAT!</p>
<p>In the end, on that final day, in the voting booth, on November 2010, I will emphatically vote for who is LEFT STANDING: Mapp or Donastrog OVER de Jongh. </p>
<p>Governor Mapp or Governor Donastorg January 2011!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

